|
CAPE
HATTERAS UPDATE and PLEA FOR ACTION
Eric Paulson
NJBBA is at a very interesting point in access and political issues.
Our access is being threatened on a biblical scale at
Cape
Hatteras
in
North Carolina
. The deep pockets of the Defenders
of Wildlife and the National Audubon Society are trying to essentially close
most of Hatteras and
Ocracoke
Islands
to vehicle and pedestrian access. Their
lawsuit to close all potential nesting habitat for piping plover and other
wildlife, threatened and endangered or not, could possibly spell the end of
access at the seashore. There would
be very small areas available for access if the DoW and NAS are successful.
OBPA, NCBBA,
Dare
County
and
Hyde
County
are interveners in the lawsuit along side the NPS.
At the same
tim
e negotiated rulemaking is progressing to develop and adopt an ORV plan
acceptable to all user groups. On
April 16 an agreement (forced) was reached between the parties.
A Consent Decree was sent to Judge Boyle of the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of North Carolina for his approval.
It maintains limited access, but imposes large buffer zones around nests
and limits night
tim
e driving during the sea turtle nesting period.
Go to www.NCBBA.org or www.OPBA.org
to see the maps of buffer zones and the consent decree.
Keep checking the NCBBA and OBPA websites for up to date information.
On June 11, 2008,
U.S.
Sens. Elizabeth Dole and Richard Burr and U.S. Rep. Walter Jones introduced
legislation in the Senate and House of Representatives that would reinstate the
Interim Management Strategy governing off-road vehicle use on Cape Hatteras
National Seashore (CHNS). The reinstatement of the original Interim Management
Strategy, issued by the National Park Service (NPS) on June 13, 2007, would set
aside current mandates and requirements which were put in place in the wake of a
consent decree filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, that prevent off-road vehicle and citizen access to a
significant portion of this National Seashore.
These bills, S.3113 and H.R.6233, need our support.
The bills need sponsors. Having
a Senator or Congressman/woman saying that they support this bill doesn’t mean
anything. Your elected official
needs to sign on as a co-sponsor. That’s
where the rubber meets the road. The
rest is just lip service. Write your
Senators and Congressmen/women about how you feel on these bills.
The best impact is a handwritten letter, next is a signed letter, then
emails and faxes. On the following
page is a sample letter from the ASA. Feel
free to copy it, scan it, re-write it by hand, edit it- whatever you want.
Just send it in. If you
don’t know who your senators or congress men/women are they can be found in
the phone book or at www.senate.gov or www.house.gov.
You can also send an email or print out a copy of this letter from the
website at :
http://capwiz.com/keepamericafishing/issues/alert/?alertid=11575146&PROCESS=Take+Action
Updated sample letters below:
Sample
Letter Congressman/woman in support of bill H.R. 6233
(House
of Representatives)
Dear Congress (man/woman) _____________,
As an avid angler on the
North Carolina
seashore, and your constituent, I am writing to ask that you co-sponsor H.R.
6233. This bill reinstates the Interim Protected Species Management Strategy (IMS)
governing off-road vehicle (ORV) use in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore
Recreation Area (CHNSRA). This would allow avid fishermen like me reasonable
access to the beaches while still providing shorebirds and other species
adequate protection.
Recreational fishing is one of the most enjoyable American pas
tim
es, and CHNSRA has some of the best surf fishing locations on the east coast –
accessible only by ORV. However, a recent consent decree is prohibiting both ORV
and pedestrian access to vast areas of the Seashore, preventing more than just
anglers from enjoying this national treasure.
Despite the fact that the IMS was being implemented by the National Park Service
(NPS) to protect shorebirds and other wildlife and a negotiated rulemaking
committee was convened to developed a long-term management plan for the use of
ORVs in CHNSRA to balance the resource needs of the shorebirds and appropriate
access for ORVs and pedestrians, members of the environmental community sued the
NPS claiming that the IMS was not protective enough. This resulted in the
Consent Decree, which went into effect on May 1, 2008. Instead of allowing
restricted, yet reasonable access to the beach, the Consent Decree has forced
the NPS to implement vast beach closures that have also resulted in cutting off
access to the most popular fishing spots, like Bodie Spit, Cape Point, and
Hatteras Inlet.
The
Cape
Hatteras
community, lifelong stewards of the CHNSRA, have all but been kicked out of the
Seashore they call home. Visitors have cancelled their trips because they can no
longer access the most popular portions of the Seashore. The entire economy of
this historic beach community, which depends on tourism and ORV access, is now
suffering undue economic impacts.
Please support passage of H.R. 6233 so the
Cape
Hatteras
community can regain its voice in the Negotiated Rulemaking process,
appropriate access to this national treasure can be preserved for our future
enjoyment, and the economy and lifestyle of the entire Outer Banks can be saved.
The IMS is a reasonable plan that protects wildlife while still allowing ORV and
pedestrian access to all groups that use the beach, including fishermen,
kiteboarders, birdwatchers, and families.
Thank you for your consideration,
Your Name
Sample
Letter to your Senator in support of bill S.3113
(Senate)
Dear Senator
_____________________,
As an avid angler on the
North Carolina
seashore, and your constituent, I am writing to ask that you co-sponsor S.
3113. This bill reinstates the Interim Protected Species Management Strategy (IMS)
governing off-road vehicle (ORV) use in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore
Recreation Area (CHNSRA). This would allow avid fishermen like me reasonable
access to the beaches while still providing shorebirds and other species
adequate protection.
Recreational fishing is one of the most enjoyable American pas
tim
es, and CHNSRA has some of the best surf fishing locations on the east coast –
accessible only by ORV. However, a recent consent decree is prohibiting both ORV
and pedestrian access to vast areas of the Seashore, preventing more than just
anglers from enjoying this national treasure.
Despite the fact that the IMS was being implemented by the National Park Service
(NPS) to protect shorebirds and other wildlife and a negotiated rulemaking
committee was convened to developed a long-term management plan for the use of
ORVs in CHNSRA to balance the resource needs of the shorebirds and appropriate
access for ORVs and pedestrians, members of the environmental community sued the
NPS claiming that the IMS was not protective enough. This resulted in the
Consent Decree, which went into effect on May 1, 2008. Instead of allowing
restricted, yet reasonable access to the beach, the Consent Decree has forced
the NPS to implement vast beach closures that have also resulted in cutting off
access to the most popular fishing spots, like Bodie Spit, Cape Point, and
Hatteras Inlet.
The
Cape
Hatteras
community, lifelong stewards of the CHNSRA, have all but been kicked out of the
Seashore they call home. Visitors have cancelled their trips because they can no
longer access the most popular portions of the Seashore. The entire economy of
this historic beach community, which depends on tourism and ORV access, is now
suffering undue economic impacts.
Please support passage of S. 3113 so the
Cape
Hatteras
community can regain its voice in the Negotiated Rulemaking process,
appropriate access to this national treasure can be preserved for our future
enjoyment, and the economy and lifestyle of the entire Outer Banks can be saved.
The IMS is a reasonable plan that protects wildlife while still allowing ORV and
pedestrian access to all groups that use the beach, including fishermen,
kiteboarders, birdwatchers, and families.
Thank you for your consideration,
Your Name
|